Head-to-head · 2026
University of Minnesota-Crookston vs University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Compare average net price ($12,212 at University of Minnesota-Crookston; $16,778 at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities), ROI score (11.89 vs 10.28), ten-year median earnings ($58,056 vs $69,020), and admissions selectivity (87.9% acceptance at University of Minnesota-Crookston; 79.8% at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities) using federal College Scorecard data. University of Minnesota-Twin Cities has a 4-2 metric-level edge. University of Minnesota-Crookston leads on ROI, but the cost and earnings signals are split enough that this is not a one-metric decision.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
9 metrics, side by side. A colored cell marks a metric-level advantage. Green = lower-is-better, violet = higher-is-better.
| Metric | University of Minnesota-Crookston | University of Minnesota-Twin Cities |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score | 11.89 ✓ | 10.28 |
| Avg net price | $12,212 ✓ | $16,778 |
| Median earnings (10y) | $58,056 | $69,020 ✓ |
| Acceptance rate | 87.9% | 79.8% ✓ |
| Graduation rate | 49.8% | 85.3% ✓ |
| Median debt | $20,500 | $19,500 ✓ |
| Enrollment | 1,729 | 31,855 |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
| Avg SAT | — | 1362 |
| Metric advantages | 2 | 4 |
Value readout
Where each school has the edge
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities costs $4,566 more per year than University of Minnesota-Crookston ($16,778 vs $12,212). University of Minnesota-Twin Cities graduates report $10,964 higher median earnings after ten years ($69,020 vs $58,056). On EduGradify's model that puts University of Minnesota-Crookston ahead on projected ROI (11.89 vs 10.28, exceptional investment).
The more affordable option (University of Minnesota-Crookston) also posts the better return, making it the lower-risk pick on cost alone. On admissions, University of Minnesota-Crookston is accessible at 87.9% acceptance versus 79.8% (accessible) at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.
Frequently asked
University of Minnesota-Crookston vs University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, answered
5 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Is University of Minnesota-Crookston or University of Minnesota-Twin Cities the better value?
University of Minnesota-Crookston has the higher EduGradify ROI score (11.89 vs 10.28), meaning its ten-year earnings go further against its net price.
Which school costs less after aid?
University of Minnesota-Crookston is cheaper — average net price $12,212 per year vs $16,778 at University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. The annual difference of $4,566 adds up to about $18,264 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities reports higher median earnings ten years after entry: $69,020 vs $58,056 at University of Minnesota-Crookston. The annual gap in the federal data is $10,964.
Which school is harder to get into?
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities is more selective at 79.8% acceptance vs 87.9% at University of Minnesota-Crookston.
What should I compare beyond ROI?
Use the ROI score as a value screen, then compare aid letters, program fit, graduation rate, location, campus size, and debt. University of Minnesota-Crookston reports a A value grade; University of Minnesota-Twin Cities reports B.