Head-to-head · 2026
University of Minnesota-Crookston vs University of Minnesota-Rochester
Compare average net price ($12,212 at University of Minnesota-Crookston; $13,744 at University of Minnesota-Rochester), ROI score (11.89 vs 12.55), ten-year median earnings ($58,056 vs $69,020), and admissions selectivity (87.9% acceptance at University of Minnesota-Crookston; 71% at University of Minnesota-Rochester) using federal College Scorecard data. University of Minnesota-Rochester has a 5-1 metric-level edge. University of Minnesota-Rochester leads on ROI, but the cost and earnings signals are split enough that this is not a one-metric decision.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
9 metrics, side by side. A colored cell marks a metric-level advantage. Green = lower-is-better, violet = higher-is-better.
| Metric | University of Minnesota-Crookston | University of Minnesota-Rochester |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score | 11.89 | 12.55 ✓ |
| Avg net price | $12,212 ✓ | $13,744 |
| Median earnings (10y) | $58,056 | $69,020 ✓ |
| Acceptance rate | 87.9% | 71% ✓ |
| Graduation rate | 49.8% | 57.4% ✓ |
| Median debt | $20,500 | $19,500 ✓ |
| Enrollment | 1,729 | 568 |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
| Avg SAT | — | 1183 |
| Metric advantages | 1 | 5 |
Value readout
Where each school has the edge
University of Minnesota-Rochester costs $1,532 more per year than University of Minnesota-Crookston ($13,744 vs $12,212). University of Minnesota-Rochester graduates report $10,964 higher median earnings after ten years ($69,020 vs $58,056). On EduGradify's model that puts University of Minnesota-Rochester ahead on projected ROI (12.55 vs 11.89, exceptional investment).
The pricier option (University of Minnesota-Rochester) still wins on return, because stronger graduate salaries outweigh its higher net price. On admissions, University of Minnesota-Crookston is accessible at 87.9% acceptance versus 71% (accessible) at University of Minnesota-Rochester.
Frequently asked
University of Minnesota-Crookston vs University of Minnesota-Rochester, answered
5 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Is University of Minnesota-Crookston or University of Minnesota-Rochester the better value?
University of Minnesota-Rochester has the higher EduGradify ROI score (12.55 vs 11.89), meaning its ten-year earnings go further against its net price.
Which school costs less after aid?
University of Minnesota-Crookston is cheaper — average net price $12,212 per year vs $13,744 at University of Minnesota-Rochester. The annual difference of $1,532 adds up to about $6,128 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
University of Minnesota-Rochester reports higher median earnings ten years after entry: $69,020 vs $58,056 at University of Minnesota-Crookston. The annual gap in the federal data is $10,964.
Which school is harder to get into?
University of Minnesota-Rochester is more selective at 71% acceptance vs 87.9% at University of Minnesota-Crookston.
What should I compare beyond ROI?
Use the ROI score as a value screen, then compare aid letters, program fit, graduation rate, location, campus size, and debt. University of Minnesota-Crookston reports a A value grade; University of Minnesota-Rochester reports A.