Head-to-head · 2026
Texas A & M International University vs The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Side-by-side ROI breakdown. 4 wins for Texas A & M International University, 3 for The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley — Texas A & M International University has more metric-level advantages.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric, winner flagged
9 metrics, side by side. The colored cell wins. Green = lower-is-better wins, indigo = higher-is-better wins.
| Metric | Texas A & M International University | The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score | 33.26 ✓ | 25.68 |
| Avg net price | $3,637 ✓ | $4,831 |
| Median earnings (10y) | $48,386 | $49,620 ✓ |
| Acceptance rate | 44.4% ✓ | 94.2% |
| Graduation rate | 46.5% | 50.9% ✓ |
| Median debt | $15,000 | $12,950 ✓ |
| Enrollment | 6,667 | 28,666 |
| Ownership | Public | Public |
| Avg SAT | 993 ✓ | 985 |
| Wins | 4 | 3 |
Value readout
Where each school has the edge
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley costs $1,194 more per year than Texas A & M International University ($4,831 vs $3,637). The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley graduates report $1,234 higher median earnings after ten years ($49,620 vs $48,386). On EduGradify's model that puts Texas A & M International University ahead on projected ROI (33.26 vs 25.68, exceptional investment).
The more affordable option (Texas A & M International University) also posts the better return, making it the lower-risk pick on cost alone. On admissions, Texas A & M International University is selective at 44.4% acceptance versus 94.2% (accessible) at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.
Frequently asked
Texas A & M International University vs The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, answered
5 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Is Texas A & M International University or The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley the better value?
Texas A & M International University has the higher EduGradify ROI score (33.26 vs 25.68), meaning its ten-year earnings go further against its net price.
Which school costs less after aid?
Texas A & M International University is cheaper — average net price $3,637 per year vs $4,831 at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. The annual difference of $1,194 adds up to about $4,776 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley reports higher median earnings ten years after entry: $49,620 vs $48,386 at Texas A & M International University. The annual gap in the federal data is $1,234.
Which school is harder to get into?
Texas A & M International University is more selective at 44.4% acceptance vs 94.2% at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.
What should I compare beyond ROI?
Use the ROI score as a value screen, then compare aid letters, program fit, graduation rate, location, campus size, and debt. Texas A & M International University reports a A+ value grade; The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley reports A+.