Head-to-head · 2026
College of Biblical Studies-Houston vs Texas A & M International University
Compare average net price ($672 at College of Biblical Studies-Houston; $3,637 at Texas A & M International University), ROI score (146.06 vs 33.26), ten-year median earnings ($39,260 vs $48,386), and admissions context (Open / not reported at College of Biblical Studies-Houston; 44.4% at Texas A & M International University) using federal College Scorecard data. Texas A & M International University has a narrow 3-2 metric-level edge. College of Biblical Studies-Houston leads on ROI, but the cost and earnings signals are split enough that this is not a one-metric decision.
Face to face
Metric-by-metric comparison
9 metrics, side by side. A colored cell marks a metric-level advantage. Green = lower-is-better, violet = higher-is-better.
| Metric | College of Biblical Studies-Houston | Texas A & M International University |
|---|---|---|
| ROI score | 146.06 ✓ | 33.26 |
| Avg net price | $672 ✓ | $3,637 |
| Median earnings (10y) | $39,260 | $48,386 ✓ |
| Acceptance rate | Open / not reported | 44.4% |
| Graduation rate | 40% | 46.5% ✓ |
| Median debt | $25,570 | $15,000 ✓ |
| Enrollment | 419 | 6,667 |
| Ownership | Private Non-Profit | Public |
| Avg SAT | — | 993 |
| Metric advantages | 2 | 3 |
Value readout
Where each school has the edge
Texas A & M International University costs $2,965 more per year than College of Biblical Studies-Houston ($3,637 vs $672). Texas A & M International University graduates report $9,126 higher median earnings after ten years ($48,386 vs $39,260). On EduGradify's model that puts College of Biblical Studies-Houston ahead on projected ROI (146.06 vs 33.26, exceptional investment).
The more affordable option (College of Biblical Studies-Houston) also posts the better return, making it the lower-risk pick on cost alone. On admissions, Texas A & M International University reports 44.4% acceptance; College of Biblical Studies-Houston does not report a standard acceptance rate in the current federal data.
Frequently asked
College of Biblical Studies-Houston vs Texas A & M International University, answered
4 of the most common questions, with real numbers from federal data.
Is College of Biblical Studies-Houston or Texas A & M International University the better value?
College of Biblical Studies-Houston has the higher EduGradify ROI score (146.06 vs 33.26), meaning its ten-year earnings go further against its net price.
Which school costs less after aid?
College of Biblical Studies-Houston is cheaper — average net price $672 per year vs $3,637 at Texas A & M International University. The annual difference of $2,965 adds up to about $11,860 over four years.
Which school reports higher earnings?
Texas A & M International University reports higher median earnings ten years after entry: $48,386 vs $39,260 at College of Biblical Studies-Houston. The annual gap in the federal data is $9,126.
What should I compare beyond ROI?
Use the ROI score as a value screen, then compare aid letters, program fit, graduation rate, location, campus size, and debt. College of Biblical Studies-Houston reports a A+ value grade; Texas A & M International University reports A+.